Connect with us

Substacks

Today Is Israel’s 9/11 Bari Weiss

Published

on

You’re about to withstand a barrage of lies about the war that broke out today in Israel.

Some of those lies will be explicit. Some of them will be lies of omission. Others will be lies of obfuscation. Or lies of minimization. Lies told by people who are simply too afraid to look at such an ugly, barbarous reality. And lies told by people whose true beliefs are too ugly to quite say aloud. Turn on cable news and you can hear some of them right now.

So let’s get some facts straight.

Israel was attacked last night. It was attacked by Hamas terrorists who streamed over the border from Gaza. They came on foot and on motorbikes. They came by truck and by car and by paraglider. They came to Israel to murder and maim and mutilate anyone they could find. And that is what they did.

It is impossible to know the numbers of the dead or the missing or the injured. 

The official numbers as of this writing: 300 Israelis dead; 1,590 wounded. And dozens—maybe many more—taken hostage into Gaza. They include women, elders, and children. 

But none of those words or numbers capture the evil of what unfolded today

Young festival-goers running for their lives. Teenage girls dragged by their hair by Hamas men. An old woman forced to pose with a Hamas rifle. A mother—a hostage—cradling two redheaded babies in her arms.

I have friends in Israel. Each one of them has a story of someone they know who is missing. Or injured. Or killed. This was not a tit-for-tat, as you’ll see the mainstream media try to spin it. This was not a justifiable military response, or just another day in a cycle of violence. This was the slaughter of innocent civilians.

New York City’s Democratic Socialists of America today announced a protest in honor of the attacks. It’s called All Out for Palestine: “In solidarity with the Palestinian people and their right to resist 75 years of occupation and apartheid.” The anti-Zionist group IfNotNow explained the attacks as Israel’s fault and said of the dead Jews: “Their blood is on the hands of the Israeli government.” 

You will see a lot like this in the coming days. Ancient lies told in new language whose end is always, strangely, the same: a justification for genocide. 

Think about 9/11 and the kind of shock and terror we felt. That is what Israelis feel today. That is the level of devastation Israel is now experiencing. 

We are left with so many questions:

How did this happen?

Who is to blame for this catastrophic security failure? 

How will Israel respond? How will Israel save the hostages in Gaza? 

What was the extent of Iran’s involvement in this sophisticated operation? 

Will this change the Biden administration’s policy toward the Islamic Republic? 

And so many more.

Those are the questions that require answers. But for today, while others offer mealy-mouthed pablum, we want to do something simple: to tell the truth—plainly—about a catastrophic day.

We’ll have much more reporting for you in the coming days. We’re going to work hard to give you the kind of independent, honest journalism you expect from The Free Press. So if you believe in our work, please, support us by becoming a paid subscriber today:

Subscribe now

Herewith, three essays from a nation at war. The first, by Noah Pollak, explains why today was Israel’s 9/11—and urges us not to avert our eyes from evil. The second, by 20-year-old Arad Fruchter, is a first-person account of his encounter with Hamas terrorists in Israel’s southern desert. The third, by Rabbi Daniel Gordis, tells of a day that began with joyous singing at synagogue and ended with his son being called up to war. And on Honestly: a conversation with historian and former Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren.

 

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Substacks

Hurricane Helene Has Exposed an Insane Liberal Myth River Page

Published

on

By

“From the destruction of Helene, a new theory has arisen: The storm, guided by anti-racist forces, deliberately ravaged ‘sundown towns,’ ” writes River Page for The Free Press. (Chandan Khanna via Getty Images)

Last week, Hurricane Helene swept across the southeastern United States, killing more than 130 people and causing up to $160 billion in property damage. When devastating natural disasters strike, people often look for explanations. In the evangelical church where I grew up, it was taken as near-gospel that 2005’s Hurricane Katrina was God’s way of punishing New Orleans for being, well, New Orleans. In 2012, conspiracy theorists suggested that President Barack Obama created Hurricane Sandy using a military research program to boost his reelection odds against Mitt Romney. Meanwhile, an army of “experts” have blamed climate change for virtually every adverse weather event in the past decade, including this most recent one. 

But now, from the biblical destruction of Hurricane Helene, a new theory has arisen: The storm, guided by unseen, anti-racist spiritual forces, deliberately ravaged “sundown towns.”

In Jim Crow–era United States, sundown towns were all-white municipalities that got their name from signs that directed black people to leave by nightfall under the implicit threat of lynching. The unfounded idea that such places still exist has been floating around the internet for years.

It reared its head most recently when numerous people used Hurricane Helene as an opportunity to argue online that sundown towns still exist. In this TikTok, which has nearly 100,000 views, a self-professed Hurricane Katrina survivor says that sundown towns “are still out there,” before saying: “I feel like people are brushing it under the rug because it’s a tragedy, and I get that, but the facts of the situation are that a lot of these places were sundown towns.” 

In this TikTok video, which has 20,000 likes, a guy argues that the hurricane veered off the course it was supposed to take and instead hit “a bunch of sundown towns.” 

“The ancestors are not playing. They need to destroy all those towns just like they came in and destroyed ours,” said one commenter on X. 

“God said no VENGEANCE! is better than his,” said another

A crowdsourced map of alleged sundown towns in the United States. (via Tougaloo College)

As evidence that sundown towns still exist, users often cite a crowdsourced map maintained by Tougaloo College, a historically black university in Mississippi. To put it mildly, the map is a mess. Although it implicitly takes the position that sundown towns still exist—if you click on a location, one of the categories is “Still Sundown?” (I was unable to find a place that fell into this last category.) But the map itself displays only how the unnamed contributors regard each town’s historical status as a sundown town: Probable, Possible, Surely, Don’t Know.

But since the map doesn’t make this clear, people can reference it and claim that hundreds if not thousands of sundown towns still exist today—as this white, left-wing TikToker did earlier this year in a video that has over 4.5 million views.

Beyond the map’s misleading layout lies a lot of vilifying conjecture. For example, the upscale resort town of Orange Beach, Alabama, is listed as a “probable” sundown town in the past, but if you click on it for more information (and many won’t), you will be redirected to another page, with a section labeled “Still Sundown?” The answer? “Probably not, although still very few black people.”

This gives black people the indication that they should be somewhat uncomfortable in Orange Beach, a pleasant little resort town less than 40 miles from my house. I can assure you that black people can still be found there after sunset—typically on vacation and having a good time.

So, people have nothing to fear from communities like Orange Beach that were possibly never sundown towns. But what about those places that definitely were? Of these, the most frequently cited is Vidor, a rough little town in East Texas that played host to Ku Klux Klan marches and desegregation orders as recently as the early 1990s. On TikTok, a white gentleman warns “black and queer people” not to visit Vidor, lest they be “lynched.” (He’s clearly never been there himself because he mispronounces the town’s name.)

This ignores the incredibly overt recent efforts Vidor has made to atone for its past. In addition to explicit efforts by city leadership to rehabilitate Vidor’s reputation—such as the chief of police apologizing for the town’s racist past and swearing in a young black boy who was battling cancer as an honorary cop—Vidor’s residents, who are still mostly white, led a proportionally well-attended Black Lives Matter rally in 2020. Three years later, residents ran a small group of visiting neo-Nazis out of town. (The group requested a police escort because they—the racists—felt unsafe.)

In addition to disparaging Hurricane Helene’s victims, the recent insistence that sundown towns still exist causes people unnecessary paranoia. Take this TikTok, created by a black woman who believes she lives in a sundown town and that the sirens she hears in her neighborhood are messages that black people need to go inside. She reports getting this information from “a white girl on TikTok” who also claims to live in a sundown town. 

That so much of the misinformation about the continued existence of sundown towns seems to originate with white leftists is infuriating but not totally unexpected. They want to feel special and signal that they are different and better than other white people, which is easier to do if you erect a vision of contemporary America where thousands of American towns are filled with racists waiting to lynch black people after nightfall. People, some black and some white, virtually all left wing, want to believe towns like Vidor haven’t changed. They don’t want to accept that overt racism is an exceedingly rare phenomenon in America confined to a small fringe that even East Texas rednecks in a former “sundown town” won’t abide. 

River Page is a reporter for The Free Press. Follow him on X @river_is_nice and read his piece “Stop Saying Florida Isn’t Safe for Gay People. It’s Fine.

And to support more of our work, become a Free Press subscriber today:

Subscribe now

 

Continue Reading

Substacks

September 30, 2024 Heather Cox Richardson

Published

on

By

 

Continue Reading

Substacks

October 1, 2024 Heather Cox Richardson

Published

on

By

More than 45,000 U.S. dock workers went on strike today for the first time since 1977, nearly 50 years ago. The International Longshoremen’s Association union, which represents 45,000 port workers, is negotiating with the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) employer group over a new contract. The strike will shut down 36 ports from Maine to Texas, affecting about half the country’s shipping. Analysts from J.P. Morgan estimate that the strike could cost the U.S. economy about $5 billion a day. The strikers have said they will continue to unload military cargo.

Dockworkers want a 77% increase in pay over six years and better benefits, while USMX has said it has offered to increase wages by nearly 50%, triple employer contributions to retirement plans, and improve health care options. In the Washington Post, economics columnist Heather Long pointed out that the big issue at stake is the automation that threatens union jobs.

Although the strike threatens to slow the economy depending on how long it lasts, President Joe Biden has refused requests to force the strikers back to work, reiterating his support for collective bargaining. He noted that ocean carriers have made record profits since the pandemic—sometimes in excess of 800% over prepandemic levels—and that executive compensation and shareholder profits have reflected those profits. “It’s only fair that workers, who put themselves at risk during the pandemic to keep ports open, see a meaningful increase in their wages as well,” Biden said in a statement.  

In the presidential contest, the Trump-Vance campaign is trying to preserve its false narrative. In Wisconsin today, Trump accused Vice President Harris of murder—although he appeared to get confused about the victim—and claimed that she has a phone app on which the heads of cartels can get information about where to drop undocumented immigrants. He also said that Kim Jong Un of North Korea is trying to kill him.

When asked if he should have been tougher on Iran after it launched ballistic missiles in 2020 on U.S. forces in Iraq, leaving more than 100 U.S. soldiers injured, Trump rejected the idea that soldiers with traumatic brain injuries were actually hurt. He said “they had a headache” and said he thought the attack “was a very nice thing because they didn’t want us to retaliate.”

Trump also backed out of a scheduled interview with 60 Minutes that correspondent Scott Pelley was slated to conduct on Thursday. 60 Minutes noted that for more than 50 years, the show has invited both campaigns to appear on the broadcast before the election and this year, both campaigns agreed to an interview. Trump’s spokesperson complained that 60 Minutes “insisted on doing live fact checking, which is unprecedented.” Vice President Kamala Harris will participate in her interview as planned. 

The campaign’s resistance to independent fact checking of their false narrative came up in tonight’s vice presidential debate on CBS between Minnesota governor Tim Walz, Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris’s running mate, and Ohio senator J.D. Vance, running mate for Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump. CBS Evening News anchor Norah O’Donnell and Face the Nation moderator and chief foreign affairs correspondent Margaret Brennan moderated the debate.

Walz’s goal in the debate was to do no harm to Vice President Harris’s campaign, and he achieved that. Vance’s goal was harder: to give people a reason to vote for Donald Trump. It is doubtful he moved any needles there. 

The moments that did stand out in the debate put a spotlight on Vance’s tenuous relationship with the truth. When Vance lied again about the migrants in Springfield, Ohio, who are in the United States legally, Brennan added: “Just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio, does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status.”

Vance responded: “The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check.”

There were two other big moments of the evening, both based in lies. First, Vance claimed that Trump, who tried repeatedly to repeal or weaken the Affordable Care Act, “saved” it. Then, Walz asked Vance directly if Trump lost the 2020 presidential election. Vance refused to answer, saying he is “focused on the future,” and warned that “the threat of censorship” is the real problem in the U.S. 

Walz said: “That’s a damning non-answer.” 

Former chair of the Republican Party Michael Steele said after the debate: “I don’t care where you are on policy…. If you cannot in 2024 answer that question, you are unfit for office.”

It was significant that Vance tried to avoid saying either that Trump won in 2020—a litmus test for MAGA Republicans—or that he lost, a reflection of reality. While this debate probably didn’t move a lot of voters for the 2024 election, what it did do was make Vance look like a far more viable candidate than his running mate. Waffling on the Big Lie seemed designed to preserve his candidacy for future elections.

It seems likely that the message behind Vance’s smooth performance wasn’t lost on Trump. As the debate was going on, Trump posted: “The GREAT Pete Rose just died. He was one of the most magnificent baseball players ever to play the game. He paid the price! Major League Baseball should have allowed him into the Hall of Fame many years ago. Do it now, before his funeral!” 

Former Cincinnati Reds baseball player Rose died yesterday at 83. 

Notes:

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-east-coast-dockworkers-head-toward-strike-after-deal-deadline-passes-2024-10-01/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/10/01/dock-worker-strike-jobs-pay-automation/

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2024/10/01/harold-daggett-trump-photo-longshoremens-union/75474233007/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2024/10/01/statement-from-president-joe-biden-on-the-negotiations-between-usmx-and-the-international-longshoremens-association/

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/01/business/us-port-workers-strike-tuesday/index.html

https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/01/politics/fact-check-vance-walz-debate/index.html

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/live/2024/oct/01/election-vance-walz-harris-trump-vp-debate

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2024/sep/20/jd-vance/vance-misleads-trump-tried-to-take-the-aca-down-no/

The Bulwark
JD Vance Was So Good, It May Drive Trump Crazy
A few thoughts on Tuesday’s VP debate…
Read more

https://apnews.com/article/longshoremen-strike-pay-automation-ports-jobs-consumers-3aa66e0a05db25a49645fad404a5f000

X:

AccountableGOP/status/1841290326268420300

joshtpm/status/1841323473412493694

AccountableGOP/status/1841290326268420300

atrupar/status/1841306806347350107

AndrewFeinberg/status/1841307277950591194

tbonier/status/1841298144849527292

atrupar/status/1841216282001072442

atrupar/status/1841262027618066747

atrupar/status/1841260252911587598

Acyn/status/1841260936595652920

Alyssafarah/status/1841273671194702274

atrupar/status/1841260764390191137

brianstelter/status/1841272468696092705

travisakers/status/1841264356702494844

gtconway3d/status/1841245080880861251

RonFilipkowski/status/1841259348233773443

60Minutes/status/1841236651994915183

KamalaHQ/status/1841331820014469505

Share

 

Continue Reading

Shadow Banned

Copyright © 2023 mesh news project // awake, not woke // news, not narrative // deep inside the filter bubble