“The Corporation” is a Canadian documentary film released in 2003, directed by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott, and written by Joel Bakan. The film is based on Bakan’s book, “The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power”. It critically analyzes the modern-day corporation, its development, and its pervasive influence over society.

The documentary is structured around the idea of comparing corporations to a human being, using a diagnostic checklist from the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) to assess the ‘personality’ of the corporate ‘person’. It concludes that, if the corporation were indeed a human, it would be considered a psychopath. The film delves into various aspects of corporate behavior, including its legal status as a person, its self-interest, its lack of concern for others, and its ability to manipulate and deceive.

The film features interviews with corporate insiders, critics, and thinkers, including Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, and Milton Friedman. It explores the history of the corporation, its rise to power, and the ways in which it has exploited both human and natural resources for profit. It also examines the impact of corporations on various aspects of society, including the environment, health, and democracy.

“The Corporation” also delves into the resistance against corporate power, highlighting various movements and campaigns that have sought to challenge and change corporate behavior. It ends on a somewhat hopeful note, suggesting that change is possible if enough people come together to demand it.

Overall, “The Corporation” is a thought-provoking and comprehensive examination of one of the most powerful and influential institutions of our time. It challenges the viewer to think critically about the role of corporations in our society and to consider the potential for change.

“Why We Fight” is a 2005 documentary film directed by Eugene Jarecki. The title of the film refers to the series of World War II propaganda films commissioned by the U.S. government and directed by Frank Capra. However, Jarecki’s film takes a critical look at the military-industrial complex and its influence on American foreign policy and warfare.

The film begins with the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in which he famously warned against the undue influence of the military-industrial complex. This sets the stage for the central theme of the film: the ways in which the military-industrial complex has grown and evolved since World War II, and its impact on American society and foreign policy.

“Why We Fight” weaves together a variety of perspectives, including those of former soldiers, military officials, politicians, and academics. It explores the history of American military intervention, from World War II to the Iraq War, and examines the economic and political forces that have driven these interventions. The film also delves into the impact of war on individual soldiers and their families, as well as the broader societal consequences of a militarized culture.

The film suggests that the military-industrial complex has created a self-perpetuating cycle of war, in which the interests of powerful corporations and politicians often outweigh the interests of the American people. It argues that this cycle is not only costly in terms of lives and resources, but also undermines American democracy and the principles for which the country stands.

Ultimately, “Why We Fight” is a compelling and thought-provoking examination of the forces that drive American military intervention, and the consequences of this intervention for both the United States and the world. It challenges the viewer to question the motivations behind American foreign policy and to consider the true costs of war.

Parody as Cultural Indicator

Plugins

•

Enabled plugins:

KeyMate.AI Search logo

User

How is parody a sign of a piece of media is truly a cultural sensation? And give me 3 behavioral science articles to support this data

ChatGPT

Parody is often a sign that a piece of media has become a cultural sensation for several reasons:

Widespread Recognition: For a parody to be understood and appreciated by a broad audience, the original piece of media must be widely recognized. This widespread recognition is often a sign that the original media has permeated popular culture to a significant extent.

Cultural Relevance: Parodies often highlight or exaggerate specific aspects of the original media that have resonated with the culture at large. This can include character traits, plot points, or even stylistic elements that have become iconic.

Engagement and Participation: The act of creating a parody requires a deep engagement with the original media. It involves not only understanding the original work but also creatively reimagining it. This level of engagement and participation is often indicative of the original media’s cultural impact.

As for the behavioral science articles to support this data, I will need to search the internet for relevant articles. Shall I proceed with the search?

User

Yes

ChatGPT

Used KeyMate.AI Search

I couldn’t find any specific articles on how parody indicates cultural impact within the realm of behavioral science. However, the topic is often discussed in cultural studies and media studies, where parody is seen as a form of social commentary that can reflect or shape cultural norms and values. Would you like to know more about this perspective?

2 / 2

User

Yeah give me links

ChatGPT

Used KeyMate.AI Search

Sure, here are some links that might help you understand how parody indicates cultural impact:

The Role of Parody in Popular Culture: This article from JSTOR discusses the role of parody in popular culture and its impact on society.

The Power of Parody: A chapter from a book available on Taylor & Francis Online that discusses the power of parody and its cultural significance.

Parody and Cultural Commentary: An article from Mount Holyoke College that discusses how the Monty Python comedy troupe used parody as a form of cultural commentary.

Please note that some of these links might require a subscription or purchase to access the full content.

Favicon

jstor.org

User

What do you call a communal grocery store

ChatGPT

A communal grocery store can be referred to as a “cooperative grocery store” or “food co-op.” These are grocery stores that are owned and operated by the members, who make decisions collectively and share the profits. They often focus on providing local, organic, and sustainable food options and may also have a mission to support the local community and economy.

User

Quotes about meekness

ChatGPT

Sure, here are some quotes about meekness:

“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” – Jesus Christ, Matthew 5:5

“Meekness is not weakness. Sometimes we confuse the two. But the difference between a meek person and weak person is this: a weak person can’t do anything. A meek person, on the other hand, can do something but chooses not to.” – Joyce Meyer

“True meekness is a virtue that men, under the conduct of reason, do of necessity submit unto; but we do it, I say, as a thing contrary to our natural inclination.” – John Selden

“Meekness: Uncommon patience in planning a revenge that is worth while.” – Ambrose Bierce

“With the humble is wisdom.” – Proverbs 11:2

“The meek man is not a human mouse afflicted with a sense of his own inferiority. Rather he may be in his moral life as bold as a lion and as strong as Samson; but he has stopped being fooled about himself.” – A.W. Tozer

“Meekness is the mask of malice.” – Benjamin Disraeli

“The meek may inherit the earth, but at the moment it belongs to the conceited. Like me.” – Cassandra Clare

“Meekness is marked by silence in the face of abuse and infamy, by submission to God’s way, which is higher than our way as heaven is higher than the earth, by submissiveness to others for their welfare. It is the opposite of self-assertiveness. It is not occupied with self at all.” – John Piper

“The higher the sun ariseth, the less shadow doth he cast; even so the more nearer that the man cometh to God, the less doth he esteem himself.” – Thomas à Kempis

Please note that some of these quotes may have different interpretations and it’s important to consider the context in which they are used.

User

Give me 300 word synopsis for the 2003 film “The Corporation”

ChatGPT

“The Corporation” is a Canadian documentary film released in 2003, directed by Mark Achbar and Jennifer Abbott, and written by Joel Bakan. The film is based on Bakan’s book, “The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power”. It critically analyzes the modern-day corporation, its development, and its pervasive influence over society.

The documentary is structured around the idea of comparing corporations to a human being, using a diagnostic checklist from the DSM-IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) to assess the ‘personality’ of the corporate ‘person’. It concludes that, if the corporation were indeed a human, it would be considered a psychopath. The film delves into various aspects of corporate behavior, including its legal status as a person, its self-interest, its lack of concern for others, and its ability to manipulate and deceive.

The film features interviews with corporate insiders, critics, and thinkers, including Noam Chomsky, Naomi Klein, and Milton Friedman. It explores the history of the corporation, its rise to power, and the ways in which it has exploited both human and natural resources for profit. It also examines the impact of corporations on various aspects of society, including the environment, health, and democracy.

“The Corporation” also delves into the resistance against corporate power, highlighting various movements and campaigns that have sought to challenge and change corporate behavior. It ends on a somewhat hopeful note, suggesting that change is possible if enough people come together to demand it.

Overall, “The Corporation” is a thought-provoking and comprehensive examination of one of the most powerful and influential institutions of our time. It challenges the viewer to think critically about the role of corporations in our society and to consider the potential for change.

User

Write me a synopsis for the 2005 documentary why we fight

ChatGPT

“Why We Fight” is a 2005 documentary film directed by Eugene Jarecki. The title of the film refers to the series of World War II propaganda films commissioned by the U.S. government and directed by Frank Capra. However, Jarecki’s film takes a critical look at the military-industrial complex and its influence on American foreign policy and warfare.

The film begins with the farewell address of President Dwight D. Eisenhower, in which he famously warned against the undue influence of the military-industrial complex. This sets the stage for the central theme of the film: the ways in which the military-industrial complex has grown and evolved since World War II, and its impact on American society and foreign policy.

“Why We Fight” weaves together a variety of perspectives, including those of former soldiers, military officials, politicians, and academics. It explores the history of American military intervention, from World War II to the Iraq War, and examines the economic and political forces that have driven these interventions. The film also delves into the impact of war on individual soldiers and their families, as well as the broader societal consequences of a militarized culture.

The film suggests that the military-industrial complex has created a self-perpetuating cycle of war, in which the interests of powerful corporations and politicians often outweigh the interests of the American people. It argues that this cycle is not only costly in terms of lives and resources, but also undermines American democracy and the principles for which the country stands.

Ultimately, “Why We Fight” is a compelling and thought-provoking examination of the forces that drive American military intervention, and the consequences of this intervention for both the United States and the world. It challenges the viewer to question the motivations behind American foreign policy and to consider the true costs of war.

User

Writee a 500 word synopsis before the gnome Chompsky film manufacturing of Consent

ChatGPT

“Manufacturing Consent: Noam Chomsky and the Media” is a 1992 documentary film directed by Mark Achbar and Peter Wintonick. The film explores the political life and ideas of Noam Chomsky, a linguist, political activist, and critic of the media. Central to the film is Chomsky’s concept of ‘manufacturing consent,’ a term he coined with Edward S. Herman in their book “Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media”.

The film begins with an introduction to Noam Chomsky and his background as a linguist and political activist. It then delves into his critique of the mainstream media and its role in shaping public opinion and perpetuating the interests of the powerful elites. Chomsky argues that the media serves as a propaganda system that promotes the interests of the dominant classes and marginalizes alternative perspectives. He contends that the media narrows the range of acceptable debate and frames issues in a way that serves the interests of the powerful.

The film explores several case studies to illustrate Chomsky’s arguments. These include the media’s coverage of the Vietnam War, the Indonesian invasion of East Timor, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. In each case, Chomsky argues that the media presented a distorted view of events that served the interests of the powerful and marginalized alternative perspectives.

“Manufacturing Consent” also examines the ways in which the media is influenced by corporate and government interests. It explores the concentration of media ownership, the role of advertisers, and the influence of government sources on news coverage. Chomsky argues that these factors lead to a media system that is biased towards the interests of the powerful and against the interests of the general population.

The film also delves into Chomsky’s ideas on the role of intellectuals in society. He argues that intellectuals have a responsibility to speak out against injustice and to question the assumptions and narratives of the powerful. However, he contends that many intellectuals fail to live up to this responsibility and instead serve as apologists for the powerful.

Throughout the film, Chomsky’s ideas are interwoven with footage of him speaking at various events, interviews with him and other media critics, and clips from mainstream media coverage. This serves to illustrate his arguments and to contrast his perspective with that of the mainstream media.

Ultimately, “Manufacturing Consent” is a compelling and thought-provoking examination of the ways in which the media serves as a propaganda system that promotes the interests of the powerful and marginalizes alternative perspectives. It challenges the viewer to question the assumptions and narratives presented by the media and to seek out alternative sources of information. The film ends with a call to action, urging viewers to become more critical consumers of media and to engage in activism to challenge the status quo.