Substacks
Meet the Kremlin’s ideal Congressional candidate Noel Sims
“I mean Putin is a bad guy, but, like, a lot of people are bad guys. I mean he’s pragmatic.”
This is how Joe Kent, a former Green Beret and CIA operative running for Washington state’s 3rd congressional district, described Russian President Vladimir Putin on a podcast earlier this year.
Kent’s congressional race, a rematch between him and the district’s first Democratic representative in 12 years, is one of the most competitive in the nation. Last time, he lost by less than 3,000 votes. The Cook Political Report rates Kent’s rematch against Congresswoman Marie Gluesenkamp Perez (D-WA) as a “tossup.”
When Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, Kent — only a few months into his first run for office — described Putin’s demands to claim large parts of Ukrainian territory as “very reasonable.” Kent’s campaign has also received significant help from Senator Rand Paul (R-KY), one of the most Russia–friendly members of Congress. Through his Protecting Freedom PAC, Paul has provided nearly half a million dollars to support Kent’s candidacy.
Kent has echoed Russian propaganda about the war in Ukraine throughout his campaign during hours of interviews on conservative news programs and podcasts reviewed by Popular Information.
Meanwhile, according to an indictment unsealed by the Department of Justice last week, Russian operatives have been running a massive disinformation campaign to sow division and decrease support for Ukraine in the US. Part of this program included amplifying anti-Ukraine messages from conservative US politicians, candidates, and pundits on social media to increase support among American voters for policies favored by the Kremlin.
Kent and Putin: Ukraine and Russia share one culture and language
The first piece of Russian propaganda that Kent has pushed is that Ukrainians and Russians are one people with one common history.
On a podcast hosted by Sean Parnell in January 2024, Kent said, “Look, I don’t want America involved in the actual territorial dispute between Russia and Ukraine. I view that as an issue between two Slavic cousins. Like, they can figure out where those borders go.”
Later on the podcast, Kent continued, “[Putin] understands all this and so like he’s never really had any aspirations to anything but unite the Russian speaking people. I mean, I’ll let the Russian speaking people hash that out on their own.”
Here, Kent referenced one of the most important myths that the Kremlin has used to justify its war in Ukraine. If Ukrainians are actually Russians who share Russian culture and language, then Russia is actually saving its own people by invading.
Several months before the 2022 invasion, Putin published an essay called “On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians” in which he claims that Ukrainians are actually Russians. The Kremlin has maintained this narrative.
In March 2024, Dmitry Medvedev, the deputy chairman of Russia’s Security Council, said, “One of Ukraine’s former leaders said at some point that Ukraine is not Russia. That concept needs to disappear forever. Ukraine is definitely Russia. Historic parts of the country need to come home.”
But this narrative is false. While Ukraine has been controlled by Russia at certain times, it has a history of its own dating back to the 9th century and has been independent since 1991. And although there are certain regions of Ukraine where Russian is spoken, Ukrainian is a distinct language and is highly favored as the country’s official language and the language of education. In fact, since the Russian invasion in 2022, the number of Ukrainians who believe that Russian should be allowed to be a second official language in certain regions has decreased.
Kent and Putin: NATO is responsible for Russian aggression
Kent has also frequently pushed the Russian narrative that Russia was provoked to invade Ukraine by the expansion of NATO to Eastern European countries close to its borders.
During the same podcast appearance in which Kent called Ukrainians “Russian-speaking people,” he also claimed that NATO is encroaching on Russia:
[T]he next president, and I pray it’s going to be President Trump, I think he’s gonna have to be very clear that we’re not for NATO expansion because that’s really what started this entire thing. We’ve had this mentality that we need to continue to add countries you know to the eastern flank, right on Russia’s border of NATO. And that was against the original designs of NATO.
Since the end of the Cold War, The Kremlin has used NATO expansion to justify its attacks in Ukraine. In December 2023, Putin said in a press conference, “We remember, as I have mentioned many times before and as you know very well, how you promised us in the 1990s that [NATO] would not move an inch to the East. You cheated us shamelessly: there have been five waves of NATO expansion.”
The promise that Putin referred to, however, was never actually made. During early negotiations for the re-unification of Germany at the end of the Cold War, the US informally proposed a ban on NATO expansion in exchange for Russia giving up its half of Germany. But this condition was not a part of the final negotiations.
Additionally, the most recent NATO expansions have been the result of Russian aggression, not the cause. When Finland and Sweden joined NATO in April 2023 and March 2024 respectively, they cited Russian aggression as the catalyst for joining after remaining neutral for so long.
Kent and Putin: The US should focus on its own problems
Another message promoted by Kent, which comes straight from Putin’s playbook, is that Ukraine should be none of America’s business. He made this point during an August 27 podcast:
I mean Ukraine, before this war, was our 65th trading partner. Most Americans couldn’t find Ukraine on a map and that’s not a ding on most Americans. They couldn’t find Ukraine on a map because it didn’t matter that much to America.
Roman Osadchuk, a research associate at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab, pointed out that whether most Americans can find Ukraine on a map or not, the US still has an obligation to Ukraine — in the form of the Budapest Memorandum.
Signed in 1994, the Budapest Memorandum is an agreement between Ukraine, the US, and the UK that Ukraine would give up its nuclear arsenal in exchange for assurances that the other two countries would help Ukraine maintain its independence (although it did not specify exactly what such assistance would look like).
Kent is “actually mirroring the idea that Russians are spreading most of the time, which is that all other countries should spend time on their internal issues and not be involved in [the Russia-Ukraine war],” Osadchuk told Popular Information.
Heightening tensions over domestic politics in the US is one of the key priorities of the Russian propaganda campaign exposed by the DOJ last week. The scheme involved creating dozens of memes and other posts daily through social media accounts targeting conservative voters in all 50 states. The goal of such posts is to stoke fears about topics including the “threat of crime coming from people of color and immigrants (including new immigrants from Ukraine)” and “overspending on foreign policy [at] the expense of white US citizens.”
Kent and Putin: Western support for Ukraine could lead to World War 3
Russia and Kent both want the West to focus on internal issues instead of helping Ukraine. And they both warn that the consequences of Western aid to Ukraine will be disastrous.
During the August 27 podcast, Kent said, “So now we’re letting Biden unilaterally take us off to what would really be for all intents and purposes the start of World War 3 that potentially has a nuclear angle…The big question too is, like, it’s for what?”
According to Osadchuk, Russia ramps up its threats about global war whenever more aid from the West is being discussed. But so far there has been no follow through.
“So basically, they’re trying to [say]… ‘oh, there would be World War Three if you would continue helping Ukraine.’ But every time, they back down. So every time when Ukraine asks for specific military equipment, Russia says that ‘if you give them [anything], it will be a huge red line.’ Then Ukraine receives it, and nothing happens,” Osadchuk said.
Russian propagandists have been hard at work stoking nuclear fears. In the affidavit released last week by the Department of Justice when it indicted two Russian propagandists for pumping disinformation into American right-wing media, one of the goals of this propaganda campaign was described as “the creating of a nuclear psychosis.” Russia wants the US to be afraid that helping Ukraine will provoke global war.
One cog in a disinformation machine
It is unclear why Joe Kent, a combat veteran and former US intelligence operative, has turned to Russian propaganda. When Popular Information asked his campaign, there was no response.
Whatever the reason and whether intentional or not, Osadchuk said that Kent’s rhetoric helps Russia.
People like Kent, according to Osadchuk, are influencers. Being a politician, candidate, or talking-head, some people “are effective at promoting some specific ideas to a number of people. So in that way, they are amplifying them, willingly or unwillingly,” he said.
Along with media influencers, candidates like Kent play an important role in Russian propaganda efforts, legitimizing their talking points.
“What Russian then does with this is another important and interesting thing,” said Osadchuk. “They will point at this person and [say] ‘look, US politicians are certain that the US should not be helping Ukraine.’ They will write this in Russian, then [Russia Today] will translate it in English, and then it will be picked up again. So this is just a kind of feedback loop again and again.”
Former Republican representative Liz Cheney of Wyoming joined Vice President Kamala Harris on a stage hung with red, white, and blue bunting and signs that said “Country Over Party.” As Cheney took the stage, the crowd chanted, “Thank you, Liz!” The two were on the campaign trail today in Ripon, Wisconsin, the town that claims to be the birthplace of the Republican Party. It was in that then-tiny town in 1852 that Alvan E. Bovay, who had recently emigrated from New York, called for a new political party to stand against slavery.
The idea of a new party took off in 1854 when it became clear the Kansas-Nebraska Act permitting the westward expansion of human enslavement would become law. When they met in February of that year, people in Ripon were early participants in the movement of people across the North to defend democracy. Rather than standing against slavery alone, those organizing in 1854 stood against an entire political system, opposing the small group of elite enslavers who had taken over the U.S. government in order to establish an oligarchy and were quite clear they rejected the self-evident truth in the Declaration of Independence that all men were created equal. Instead, they intended to rule over the nation’s majority, whose labor produced the capital that southern leaders believed only elites should control.
In the face of this existential threat to the country, party divisions crumbled.
Pundits have described today’s event as a component of Harris’s ongoing outreach to Republicans, and in part, it is. That outreach, begun under President Joe Biden and continuing even more aggressively under Harris, is bearing fruit as in an open letter today, two dozen Republican former officials and lawmakers in Wisconsin endorsed Harris and her running mate Minnesota governor Tim Walz. “We have plenty of policy disagreements with Vice President Harris,” the Republicans wrote. “But what we do agree upon is more important. We agree that we cannot afford another four years of the broken promises, election denialism, and chaos of Donald Trump’s leadership.”
Lately, there have been indications of what returning Trump to office might mean.
On Tuesday, Trump suggested that the U.S. soldiers who sustained traumatic brain injuries (TBI) when Iran attacked an Iraqi base where they were stationed were not truly injured, but simply had “headaches.” Trump’s statement brought back to light a 2021 CBS report by Catherine Herridge and Michael Kaplan that found the injured soldiers had not been recognized with a Purple Heart, awarded to service members wounded or killed in the line of duty, despite qualifying for it. This slight meant they were denied the medical benefits that come with that military decoration.
The soldiers told Herridge and Kaplan that they were pressured to downplay their injuries to avoid undercutting Trump’s attempt to keep the casualty numbers in that incident low. With the story back in the news, Kaplan posted that after the report, the Army awarded the soldiers the Purple Hearts they deserved.
Journalist Magdi Jacobs recalled the argument of Trump’s lawyers before the Supreme Court that Trump could not prod a SEAL team to assassinate a rival because service members would adhere to the rules of their institutions. The Army officers’ bowing to Trump’s political demands proved that argument was wrong and set off “[m]ajor alarm bells,” Jacobs posted, suggesting that the military would not stand firm against Trump in a second term, especially now that the Supreme Court says a president cannot be prosecuted for crimes committed as part of official duties.
Scott Waldman and Thomas Frank of Politico’s E&E News covering energy and the environment reported today that two former White House officials said that Trump was “flagrantly partisan” when responding to natural disasters. One said that in 2018 Trump refused to approve disaster aid after wildfires to California, perceiving it as a Democratic state. To get disaster money, the aide showed Trump polling results revealing that Orange County, which had been badly damaged in the fires, “had more Trump supporters than the entire state of Iowa.”
Defending the Big Lie that Trump had won the 2020 presidential election, former Colorado county clerk Tina Peters in 2021 gave a security badge to a man associated with MyPillow owner Mike Lindell to enable him to breach the county’s voting systems in an unsuccessful attempt to find evidence of voter fraud. A jury found Peters guilty of four felonies related to the scheme. Today, District Court Judge Matthew Barrett sentenced Peters to nine years in prison.
But there are other stories these days of what the government can accomplish when it is focused on the good of all Americans.
About 45,000 dock workers in the International Longshoremen’s Association went on strike Tuesday when the union could not reach an agreement with the United States Maritime Alliance (USMX) employer group over a new contract. The strike shut down 36 ports from Maine to Texas, affecting about half the country’s shipping just as the areas hammered by Hurricane Helene desperately needed supplies. Dockworkers wanted a pay increase of up to 77% over six years and better benefits, as well as an end to the automation that threatens union jobs.
President Joe Biden reiterated his support for collective bargaining despite the threat to an economic slowdown from the strike. The Wall Street Journal editorial board excoriated Biden and the union, saying: “President Biden wants unions to have extortionary bargaining power, and he’s getting a demonstration of it on election eve. Congratulations.”
But today the International Longshoremen’s Association suspended the strike after USMX agreed to wage increases of 62% over six years. The two sides agreed to extend the current contract until January 15 to address the issues of benefits and automation. Administration officials White House Chief of Staff Jeff Zients, top White House economic advisor Lael Brainard, Acting Secretary of Labor Julie Su, and Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg helped broker the temporary agreement.
The government’s power to make things better is also on display amid the rubble and ruin left behind by Hurricane Helene. Yesterday evening, after taking an aerial tour of western North Carolina to survey the damage and receiving a briefing in Raleigh, President Biden thanked both “the Republican governor of South Carolina and the Democratic governor of North Carolina and all of the elected officials who’ve focused on the task at hand. In a moment like this, we put politics aside. At least we should put it all aside, and we have here. There are no Democrats or Republicans; there are only Americans. And our job is to help as many people as we can as quickly as we can and as thoroughly as we can.”
Biden explained that the federal government had 1,000 first responders in place before the storms hit, and that he had approved emergency declarations as soon as he received the requests from the governors. Yesterday he directed the Defense Department to move 1,000 soldiers to reinforce North Carolina’s National Guard to speed up the delivery of supplies like food, water, and medicine to isolated communities, some of which are accessible now only by pack mule.
He has already deployed 50 Starlink satellites for communication, and more are coming.
Teams from the Federal Emergency Management Agency are offering free temporary housing, as well as delivering food and water. They are helping people apply for the help that they need.
While Trump and MAGA Republicans insist that Biden is botching the response to Helene, CNN fact checker Daniel Dale noted that the response has gotten bipartisan praise. Republican governors Henry McMaster of South Carolina and Glenn Youngkin of Virginia both thanked Biden by name for what McMaster called a “superb” response.
So today’s bipartisan event in Ripon suggests far more than Democratic outreach to Republicans. It appears to be a commitment to a government that advances the interests of ordinary people, and protects the right of everyone to be treated equally before the law and to have a say in their government. Republican Abraham Lincoln articulated this worldview for his fledgling party in 1859 as it took a stand against oligarchs. Believing these principles accurately represented the aspirations of the nation’s founders, Lincoln called them “conservative.” People from all parties rallied to the party that promised to defend those principles.
“The president of the United States must not look at our country through the narrow lens of ideology or petty partisanship or self-interest,” Harris said today. “The president of the United States must not look at our country as an instrument for their own ambitions. Our nation is not some spoil to be won. The United States of America is the greatest idea humanity ever devised: the nation that inspired the world to believe in the possibility of a representative government. And so in the face of those who would endanger our magnificent experiment, people of every party must stand together.”
“In this election, putting patriotism ahead of partisanship is not an aspiration. It is our duty,” Cheney said. “I ask all of you here and everyone listening across this great country to join us. I ask you to meet this moment. I ask you to stand in truth, to reject the depraved cruelty of Donald Trump.
“And I ask you instead to help us elect Kamala Harris for president. I know…that…a president Harris will be able to unite this nation. I know that she will be a president who will defend the rule of law, and I know that she will be a president who can inspire all of our children—and if I might say so, especially our little girls—to do great things. So help us right the ship of our democracy so that history will say of us, when our time of testing came, we did our duty and we prevailed because we loved our country more.”
—
Notes:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-liz-cheney-joins-harris-campaign-rally-in-ripon-wis
https://apnews.com/article/kamala-harris-cheney-wisconsin-trump-89396853e5521c3870a3c88e04cbfd99
https://www.texastribune.org/2024/10/02/adam-kinzinger-republicans-colin-allred-texas/
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/4914462-colorado-county-clerk-sentenced-election-breach/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/10/03/port-strike-over/
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/03/politics/fact-check-trump-biden-hurricane-response/index.html
https://www.axios.com/2024/10/01/hurricane-helene-north-carolina-mules-aid
X:
ColinAllredTX/status/1841962653721493560
mkaplantv/status/1841299299994423466
magi_jay/status/1841522714357408136
Acyn/status/1841260936595652920
Acyn/status/1841260936595652920
atrupar/status/1841976647731347632
atrupar/status/1841972668267925537
atrupar/status/1841963353566068778
Hurricane Helene caused mass destruction across the southeastern United States, leaving thousands needing aid and at least 227 people dead. Now, former President Donald Trump is using the disaster as a political cudgel, falsely claiming that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is out of money because it diverted funds to “illegal immigrants.”
“The Harris-Biden administration says they don’t have any money [for hurricane relief]. … They spent it all on illegal migrants,” Trump said Thursday during a rally in Michigan. “They stole the FEMA money just like they stole it from a bank.”
Trump’s claim is false. FEMA is not out of money, and no money was diverted to undocumented immigrants.
FEMA, a part of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), says it has enough funds for recovery efforts in the wake of Hurricane Helene. On Wednesday, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said, “We have the immediate needs right now.” Mayorkas said he was concerned there may not be enough funds for the rest of hurricane season, with another hurricane expected to hit later this week.
But any shortfall would be driven by the increase in extreme weather events — not disaster relief funds being diverted to undocumented immigrants. FEMA has a separate program, the Shelter and Services Program, which gives funds to local governments and nonprofits to provide shelter, food, and transportation to undocumented immigrants. In 2024, Congress allocated $650 million to the program. The administration has a legal obligation to spend funds for their Congressionally-authorized purpose.
During his presidency, Trump diverted disaster relief money to provide services for undocumented immigrants. In 2019, the Trump administration informed Congress that it was taking “$155 million from the disaster fund” for “immigration detention space and temporary hearing locations for asylum seekers,” the Washington Post reported.
Trump’s lies about FEMA, which are ongoing, have also been amplified by other Republican allies, including Representative Jim Jordan (R-OH), Representative Troy Nehls (R-TX), and Elon Musk.
This is not just another lie. Spreading misinformation about FEMA’s capabilities hampers relief efforts. On Friday, FEMA Administrator Deanne Criswell said at a press conference that misinformation can lead to people who need help not registering for aid. “This level of misinformation creates the scenario where they won’t even come to us,” Criswell said.
Trump has always exploited undocumented immigrants for political advantage. But falsely blaming migrants for nearly every problem — real and imagined — is the core issue of the Trump 2024 campaign.
The Trump campaign blames undocumented immigrants for a “crime wave”
Trump’s false claim that undocumented immigrants are responsible for a crime wave is a staple of his stump speech. On August 22, Trump claimed that the Biden-Harris administration “unleashed a deadly plague of migrant crime on our country by not doing their job.” At the Turning Point Action Conference in July, Trump told the crowd, “We have a new form of crime. It’s called migrant crime.”
There is no violent crime wave. Violent crime has declined or remained flat each year of the Biden administration. According to the FBI’s 2023 crime report, violent crime decreased three percent last year, and there was a significant decline in murder (-11.3%).
Jeff Asher, co-founder of AH Datalytics and crime statistics expert, told Popular Information he has not seen “any evidence” of undocumented immigrants fueling increases in crime. Asher previously looked at “violent crime across the 14 counties along the Texas border with Mexico” and found a “relatively steady violent crime rate below that of the rest of their state and the nation as a whole.” Furthermore, research shows that immigration is linked to decreases in violent crime, and neighborhoods with higher concentrations of immigrant populations have lower crime rates.
The Trump campaign blames undocumented immigrants for voter fraud
Trump has also falsely claimed that the Biden administration is allowing undocumented immigrants to enter the country so that they can illegally vote and steal the 2024 election. Last week, Trump argued that the Biden-Harris administration “stole the FEMA money” so that they could give it to undocumented immigrants as a political strategy because they want them to “vote for them.”
During the presidential debate against Vice President Harris in September, Trump claimed that “a lot of these illegal immigrants coming in, they’re trying to get them to vote.” Trump stated, “They can’t even speak English. They don’t even know what country they’re in, practically. And these people are trying to get them to vote, and that’s why they’re allowing them into our country.” This claim has been repeated by Trump and his allies for months. It is also rooted in a white nationalist conspiracy theory called the great replacement theory.
But the reality is that it is illegal for undocumented immigrants to vote in U.S. elections. Further, data shows it almost never happens. The Heritage Foundation, a right-wing think tank, maintains a database of voter fraud that found “fewer than 100 examples of non-citizens voting between 2002 and 2022, amid more than 1 billion lawfully cast ballots.”
The Trump campaign blames undocumented immigrants for driving up housing costs
During the vice presidential debate last week, Senator JD Vance (R-OH) claimed that housing is “totally unaffordable because we brought in millions of illegal immigrants to compete with Americans for scarce homes.” Vance also argued that undocumented immigrants are “one of the most significant drivers of home prices in the country.”
This is not true. Economists and housing experts told the Washington Post that many other factors are more significant than undocumented immigrants when it comes to increases in housing prices. Additionally, many immigrants come into the country with “few financial resources,” and are therefore “far less likely to be able to buy a home.” While there is evidence that an increase in immigrants may slightly increase rent rates, just as any population increase, a study shows that the increase is minimal.
The Trump campaign plans to conduct a “mass deportation” of undocumented immigrants to lower housing costs. But, according to economists, this plan would likely increase housing costs instead of lowering them. A report by Mother Jones notes that Trump’s deportation plans may “grind the construction of new housing to a halt,” since 1.4 million undocumented workers work in construction, making up “more than 10 percent of the entire labor force, and 32 percent of roofers.”
The Trump campaign claims undocumented immigrants will bankrupt Medicare and Social Security
At nearly every campaign stop, Trump claims that undocumented immigrants will drain resources from Medicare and Social Security.
At a Pennsylvania rally on August 17, Trump said “[Harris is] going to destroy your Medicare. She’s going to destroy your Social Security. First, she has thrown open our borders. Second, she is flooding our country with millions and millions of low-wage migrants and giving them welfare, free health care, food stamps, public benefits…. She wants to make them citizens, dumping them onto Medicare and dumping them into your beautiful Social Security program.”
The GOP has also included this claim in its official 2024 platform, which reads, “Republicans will protect Medicare’s finances from being financially crushed by the Democrat plan to add tens of millions of new illegal immigrants to the rolls of Medicare. We vow to strengthen Medicare for future generations.”
Studies show, however, that immigrants boost Medicare and Social Security by contributing more tax dollars than they receive in benefits from the two programs.
A 2013 study, for example, found that in 2009, immigrants made 14.7 percent of all contributions to Medicare that year while only accounting for 7.9 percent of the program’s expenditures, resulting in a surplus of nearly $14 billion. That same year, people born in the US generated a deficit of $30.9 billion. (Undocumented immigrants are not able to enroll in Medicare.)
Immigrants have a similar effect on the Social Security budget because they increase the ratio of workers paying into the system to retirees benefiting from it. (Undocumented immigrants cannot recieve social security benefits.)
The Trump campaign blames undocumented immigrants for taking jobs from American citizens
Another popular Trump refrain is that undocumented immigrants are taking jobs from American citizens. In a September speech to the Economic Club of New York, he claimed that “100% of the jobs created under [Biden’s] administration have gone to illegal migrants that came into our country.”
According to reporting by Forbes, this is false. Since Biden took office, the number of U.S.-born people in the workforce has increased by 6%, and the number of foreign-born workers has increased by 22%. Under Trump, both workforce populations decreased, by 1.4%and 1.6%respectively.
As Popular Information has previously reported, undocumented immigrants in the US workforce mean more jobs for American citizens. If Trump is elected and carries out his plan for mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, U.S.-born citizens can expect their job opportunities to shrink. One study on the economic impacts of deportation found that for every 1 million immigrants deported between 2008 and 2014, 88,000 American workers lost jobs. Without undocumented immigrants, the American economy’s current labor shortage would be even worse.
The Trump campaign blames undocumented immigrants for smuggling Fentanyl
At a July rally, Trump claimed “We’re losing 300,000 people a year to fentanyl that comes through our border.” Vance parrotted this claim at the vice presidential debate last week, saying, “Kamala Harris let in fentanyl into our communities at record levels.”
However, it is largely American citizens who are responsible for bringing fentanyl into the country. According to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, 86.2 percent of fentanyl trafficking offenders in 2021 were U.S. citizens.
Trump’s claim that fentanyl is killing hundreds of thousands of Americans a year is also exaggerated. The total number of annual drug overdoses is between 100,000 and 110,000, while the number of opioid overdoses (which includes, but is not limited to, fentanyl deaths) is about 81,000.
The Trump campaign blames undocumented immigrants for inflation
Undocumented immigrants are also responsible for inflation, according to Trump. In July, he told supporters at a Michigan rally that “another key driver of inflation is the migrant invasion Kamala Harris has created on our southern border.”
A study by the Peterson Institute for International Economics found that if Trump succeeded in deporting 7.5 million workers over a two-year period, inflation would be 7.4 percent higher than if the mass deportation plan was not enacted because the deportation would worsen existing labor shortages and decrease production. If Trump deported 1.3 million workers, inflation would be 1.3 percent higher.
Chris Hedges Q&A on the Middle East — LIVE Chris Hedges
October 3, 2024 Heather Cox Richardson
Every problem Trump wrongfully blames on undocumented immigrants Rebecca Crosby
This is What Happens When You Try to Report Dirty Cops
THE IRON-CLAD PIÑATA Seymour Hersh
The Russell Brand Rorschach Test Kathleen Stock
RARE VIDEO: 1987 DC Hearing – NBC Warns Against Removing Fairness Doctrine – Learn Why It Matters
WATCH: CSPAN Caller Call Out the Resending of the Smith-Mundt Act – Learn Why That’s IMPORTANT
WATCH: 1975 Church Comitee Hearings on the CIA Mockingbird Media
-
Awakening Video1 year agoThis is What Happens When You Try to Report Dirty Cops
-
Substacks7 months agoTHE IRON-CLAD PIÑATA Seymour Hersh
-
Substacks1 year agoThe Russell Brand Rorschach Test Kathleen Stock
-
Substacks1 year agoA real fact-check of Trump’s appearance on Meet the Press Judd Legum
-
Substacks11 months agoLetter to the Children of Gaza – Read by Eunice Wong Chris Hedges