Crypto News
Bitcoin ETF Inflows In Context
The below is an excerpt from a recent edition of Bitcoin Magazine Pro, Bitcoin Magazine’s premium markets newsletter. To be among the first to receive these insights and other on-chain bitcoin market analysis straight to your inbox, subscribe now.
The First 5 Days
The Bitcoin spot ETF launch was one for the history books. By all accounts, it was the largest launch of an ETF product in history, beating out the previous record set by the Proshares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) launch in October 2021. First-day trading volume was huge at $4.6 billion, and it has remained relatively strong compared to typical post-launch declines of other products. We can be confident in the volume numbers, unlike the inflows. After the first two days of trading, the market was left wondering about flows because the data provided by TradFi was delayed and incomplete. Experts, such as Eric Balchunas of Bloomberg, said it was normal to have delays in reporting of flows by as much as T+3 (three days after). Bitcoin isn’t used to such bad transparency.
In the below table, you can see the GBTC outflows are now over $2 billion, with the largest day being Day 3. However, it is highly probable that most of Day 3’s flows was due to trading on Day 2, and likewise for Day 2 on Day 1, and so forth. We also cannot tell if all the issuers are up-to-date on their data. Is that all their flows or are they not done counting? We simply don’t know.
Bitcoiners are supplementing slow TradFi data which can take days by tracking flows on-chain. On Wednesday morning, James Van Straten of Cryptoslate reported that 18,400 bitcoin were sent from Grayscale to Coinbase’s Prime OTC desk right at market open, following a pattern of outflows on the two previous trading days of 9,000 bitcoin on January 16 and 4,000 bitcoin on January 12. The on-chain data from intelligence firm Arkham is trustworthy, the problem is it doesn’t match the reported outflows. Those three days of on-chain data add up to $1.3 billion worth of bitcoin and the reported outflows were only $1.1 billion. Also, interestingly there were no transactions the morning on January 18, but they resumed this morning.
Source: Arkham via @DylanLeClair_
Coinbase already custodies Grayscale’s bitcoin, so these are transfers from their custody account to the OTC desk, where other ETF market makers can pick it up, limiting the effect on the spot price.
GBTC Selling Could Be Drawing to a Close
Grayscale selling was expected but we still don’t know the ultimate amount that will end up being sold by the time the dust settles. Will 100% of their coins slowly come out, or perhaps only 10%? People are speculating the expense ratio of 1.5% versus the other ETFs averaging 0.25% might cause people to swap ETFs. If that is the case, it would not translate into any net selling. GBTC did lower their fee when they converted, from 2% down to the new 1.5%. If GBTC holders are sitting on significant unrealized gains, they might choose not to sell until the next rally. Remember, there are tax implications with swapping, also.
Many early sellers of GBTC are doing so for ideological reasons. The discount which formed in Feb 2021 took them by surprise and they felt stuck. The question is how many bitcoin is that? GBTC still has over 550,000 bitcoin as of January 19, how many of those still feel stuck? Why wouldn’t they have already swapped out in the first several trading days? I think it is less than people think. Yes, all of the bitcoin will come out eventually if they keep the expense ratio that high, but not in one sustained movement. I think the dumping will be spread out over several large rallies in the bull market. Selling from GBTC might already be slowing with the discount to NAV dropping from 150 bps on day 1 to 47 bps on January 17.
Bitcoin Price
Speaking of price, bitcoin has managed to hold support at $40,000 even with the massive outflows from GBTC and whale selling. Again, James Van Straten reports a whale who bought at $48,000 in 2021’s bull market, who held through the massive drawdown and the FTX debacle, possibly unloaded 100,000 BTC with an ask of $49,000. For context, all the ETFs ex-GBTC are still below that at 79,000 BTC. This was not a sell-the-news event, it could have simply been a whale selling after breaking even. Meaning the consistent buying pressure of the ETFs is only delayed by a week or so.
We are still in the range dating all the way back to the beginning of December, but are threatening to fall below it right now. My attention remains on $40,000 and the $44,193 line we’ve been watching that whole time, created from the high daily close back on December 8.
For those readers with beautiful low time preference, the monthly Ichimoku cloud is flipping bullish. This is an extremely bullish signal that only happens at the beginning of bull runs in bitcoin. It occurred last in October 2020 after almost flipping prior to COVID in February 2020. Interestingly, if it would have flipped in February, it would be at very nearly the same relation to the halving that we are today. Prior to 2020, the only other time this has occurred was in June 2016, at the beginning of that massive bull market, and one month prior to the July 2016 halving.
Massive Buying Pressure in Context
Using the incomplete inflow data above, we can say that the average daily buying pressure, including GBTC selling, has been more than $200 million/day. Interesting that Day 4 was the second highest, adding some evidence to the theory that buying pressure might level out around the $250-300 million mark. To put that amount in context, Microstrategy just began a 4-month process of selling $216 million in new shares to buy more bitcoin. The ETFs do that in a day. Tether is also constantly buying bitcoin for their reserves. Recently, they reported adding another $380 million in bitcoin at the end of 2023. Two out of the first five days of the ETFs were more than that.
With all those sources of gigantic demand in mind, look again at the monthly chart above, again. There is one way for this market to go. Are you ready?
If you liked this post, please give it a like and share on social media so we can spread our message! Thank you!
Data from traditional markets is slow and incomplete but show $200M per day of inflows to the Bitcoin ETFs. Demand is converging, price will respond.
Crypto News
California Is Working Towards Embracing Bitcoin
According to a press release sent to Bitcoin Magazine, an Office of California Assemblymember, Republican Phillip Chen, has appointed Proof of Workforce, a Santa Monica-based non-profit helping workers, unions, pensions, and municipalities with education-based Bitcoin adoption, to work on a variety of Bitcoin related initiatives and help with drafting an official bill for an upcoming legislative session.
“As to where and how Bitcoin and digital assets get into the trajectory of California, much is undetermined,” said Chen. “What is certain is that this industry is growing in adoption everyday, with Bitcoin serving as a global network and asset, representing 2 trillion dollars in value. Therefore, it’s important we take a meaningful look into its role in our great state of California.”
Proof of Workforce, led by its founder Dom Bei, will be advising Chen’s policy team, working on education and community engagement, and researching how Bitcoin can support and rebuild California’s infrastructure and communities.
“Bitcoin’s Genesis story has deep roots in California,” commented Bei. “A huge part of that Genesis Story is an innovative network, designed to protect the time, energy, and value of everyday, working people. Bitcoin isn’t partisan, it’s uniquely Californian.”
This isn’t Proof of Workforce’s first time helping onboard governments in California to Bitcoin. Last summer, Proof of Workforce partnered with the City of Santa Monica to open an official Bitcoin office. Since opening, the office has seen “an overwhelming amount of interest”, according to the city’s Mayor Lana Negrete. Santa Monica’s City Manager has also stated that other cities have reached out to learn more about their Bitcoin endeavors.
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 Santa Monica City Manager says “several other cities have reached out to learn more” about their official #Bitcoin Office 👀
“The Bitcoin Office has seen significant interest from the public” 🚀pic.twitter.com/ortfFTCx1S
— Bitcoin Magazine (@BitcoinMagazine) October 9, 2024
Mass adoption starts with initiatives like this. Bitcoin adoption within California’s government is beginning and with the United States embracing Bitcoin under President Trump, it is very likely that the adoption of this asset within the state government will continue over the coming years.
Over the years I’ve watched Dom Bei and Proof of Workforce onboard Careers in Government, firefighter unions in America, El Salvador, and Africa, workers, and more to Bitcoin. They’re doing it right by helping these organizations buy and hold their own bitcoin keys, making sure they’re all properly educated on not just bitcoin the asset but Bitcoin the network as well. One by one, Proof of Workforce is making real change that impacts people’s daily lives.
If you are not following Bei and Proof of Workforce on X, you should be. After talking with Dom personally, they are working on a lot of exciting initiatives that you’ll want to hear about — stay tuned.
This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
Bitcoin focused non-profit Proof of Workforce is working with the Office of California on legislation and Bitcoin initiatives.
Crypto News
What Bitcoin Price History Predicts for February 2025
As the Bitcoin market steps into 2025, investors are keenly analyzing seasonal trends and historical data to predict what February might hold. With Bitcoin’s cyclical nature often tied to its halving events, historical insights provide a valuable roadmap for navigating future performance. By examining historical data—including Bitcoin’s average monthly returns and its post-halving February performance—we aim to provide a clear picture of what February 2025 might look like.
Understanding Bitcoin’s Seasonality
The first chart, “Bitcoin Seasonality,” highlights average monthly returns from 2010 to the latest monthly close. The data underscores Bitcoin’s best-performing months and its cyclical tendencies. February has historically shown an average return of 13.62%, ranking it as one of the stronger months for Bitcoin performance.
Notably, November stands out with the highest average return at 43.74%, followed by October at 19.46%. Conversely, September has historically been the weakest month with an average return of -1.83%. February’s solid average places it in the upper tier of Bitcoin’s seasonality, offering investors hope for positive returns in early 2025.
Historical Performance of February in Post-Halving Years
A deeper dive into Bitcoin’s historical February returns reveals fascinating insights for years that follow a halving event. Bitcoin’s halving mechanism—which occurs roughly every four years—reduces block rewards by half, creating a supply shock that has historically driven price increases. February’s performance in these post-halving years has consistently been positive:
- 2013 (Post-2012 Halving): 62.71%
- 2017 (Post-2016 Halving): 22.71%
- 2021 (Post-2020 Halving): 36.80%
The average return across these three years is an impressive 40.74%. Each of these Februarys reflects the bullish momentum that often follows halving events, driven by reduced Bitcoin supply issuance and increased market demand.
Related: We’re Repeating The 2017 Bitcoin Bull Cycle
January 2025’s Performance Sets the Stage
While February 2025 is yet to unfold, the year began with a modest 7.28% return to date in January, as shown in the “Monthly Returns Heatmap.” January’s positive performance hints at a continuation of bullish sentiment in the early months of 2025, aligning with historical post-halving patterns. If February 2025 follows the trajectory of past post-halving years, it could see returns in the range of 22% to 63%, with an average expectation around 40%.
What Drives February’s Strong Post-Halving Performance?
Several factors contribute to February’s historical strength in post-halving years:
- Supply Shock: The halving reduces new Bitcoin supply entering circulation, increasing scarcity and driving price appreciation.
- Market Momentum: Investors often respond to the halving event with increased enthusiasm, pushing prices higher in the months following the event.
- Institutional Interest: In recent cycles, institutional adoption has accelerated post-halving, adding significant capital inflows to the market.
Key Takeaways for February 2025
Investors should approach February 2025 with cautious optimism. Historical and seasonal data suggest the month has strong potential for positive returns, particularly in the context of Bitcoin’s post-halving cycles. With an average return of 40.74% in past post-halving Februarys, investors might expect similar performance this year, barring any significant macroeconomic or regulatory headwinds.
Conclusion
Bitcoin’s history provides a valuable lens through which to view its future performance. February 2025 is shaping up to be another positive month, driven by the same post-halving dynamics that have historically fueled impressive gains. Combining historical data performance with a positive regulatory environment, the incoming pro-Bitcoin administration, and the news that The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued a new guideline (ASU 2023-08) fundamentally changing how Bitcoin is accounted for (Why Hundreds of Companies Will Buy Bitcoin in 2025), 2025 is shaping up to be a transformative year for Bitcoin. As always, investors should combine these insights with broader market analysis and remain prepared for Bitcoin’s inherent volatility.
Related: Why Hundreds of Companies Will Buy Bitcoin in 2025
By leveraging the lessons of history and the patterns of seasonality, Bitcoin investors can make informed decisions as the market navigates this pivotal year.
To explore live data and stay informed on the latest analysis, visit bitcoinmagazinepro.com.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always do your own research before making any investment decisions.
Discover how Bitcoin’s historical February performance and post-halving trends provide insights into what investors can expect in 2025.
Crypto News
Coinbase’s Bitcoin Loans Are Not What They Seem
Earlier today, Coinbase announced the launch of “Bitcoin-Backed Loans” using Base, its native blockchain. But there’s one problem. (Actually, two.)
These loans are not backed by Bitcoin, nor are they even on the Bitcoin blockchain.
It’s disappointing that, in 2025, companies are still willingly omitting key details to mislead Bitcoin holders into giving up custody of their coins.
Here’s the truth: these loans are collateralized by cbBTC, Coinbase’s Bitcoin-wrapped product designed to compete with wBTC and tBTC. This is not Bitcoin. In fact, cbBTC is arguably the most centralized of these “wrapped” BTC tokens. To understand the trust assumptions associated with wrapped BTC, I recommend this excellent post by the Bitcoin Layers team: Analyzing tBTC Against wBTC and cbBTC.
Here’s the TL;DR:
“The BTC backing the cbBTC token is held in reserve wallets managed by Coinbase, a US-based centralized custodial provider. Coinbase holds funds backing cbBTC in cold storage wallets across a number of geographically distributed locations and additionally has insurance on funds they custody.”
Furthermore, instead of issuing these loans on a blockchain even remotely related to Bitcoin (such as Bitcoin sidechains or Bitcoin L2s), Coinbase is issuing them through Morpho Labs, a DeFi platform best described as an AAVE competitor. While Morpho is a well-established platform—and I don’t doubt its security—it has no connection to Bitcoin.
I, for one, look forward to seeing actual Bitcoin-backed loans issued on the Bitcoin network itself. Many L2 teams are working hard to make this a reality, striving to minimize trust assumptions—or even eliminate the need for bridging altogether (bullish!).
Why do we need native Bitcoin-backed loans in the first place? Consider this: many Bitcoiners today face stringent tax regulations that impose hefty liabilities on long-term holders who sell their Bitcoin to fund significant purchases like a house or a car. Taking out a loan backed by BTC allows individuals to avoid triggering these tax events.
Moreover, most Bitcoiners are confident that Bitcoin’s price will be significantly higher in the future than it is today. So why would anyone sell an asset with such promising long-term potential? Bitcoin-backed loans enable holders to retain exposure to Bitcoin’s upside while accessing the liquidity needed to meet life’s financial demands.
In today’s market, the options for Bitcoin-backed lending are limited. You can either rely on centralized companies (like the reputable team at Unchained) or turn to “DeFi” protocols, which are often centralized themselves and, in some cases, riskier than centralized alternatives like Unchained. However, there is currently no truly Bitcoin-native solution—no option for Bitcoiners to maintain custody of their coins while accessing loans.
Some companies, like Lava.xyz, are beginning to address this gap. However, their market share remains a small fraction of the volumes handled by existing DeFi platforms. (Keep an eye on Lava—they’re poised to make waves in 2025!)
One quote from the original announcement stood out to me:
“The integration of Bitcoin-backed loans on Coinbase is ‘TradFi in the front, DeFi in the back,’” said Max Branzburg, Coinbase’s vice president of product, in a statement to The Block.
Let’s call it what it really is: centralized in the front, and centralized in the back.
It’s time to leave these misleading offerings behind and bring true Bitcoin Finance (BTCfi) to users—not just marketing buzzwords and half-truths.
Instead of saying: Bitcoin backed on-chain loans let’s say: multisig-backed derivatives loans on a centralized chain.
This article is a Take. Opinions expressed are entirely the author’s and do not necessarily reflect those of BTC Inc or Bitcoin Magazine.
Articles I write may discuss topics or companies that are part of my firm’s investment portfolio (UTXO Management). The views expressed are solely my own and do not represent the opinions of my employer or its affiliates. I’m receiving no financial compensation for these takes. Readers should not consider this content as financial advice or an endorsement of any particular company or investment. Always do your own research before making financial decisions.
Not backed by real Bitcoin – not on the Bitcoin blockchain. We can do better.
-
Awakening Video1 year ago
This is What Happens When You Try to Report Dirty Cops
-
Substacks10 months ago
THE IRON-CLAD PIÑATA Seymour Hersh
-
Substacks1 year ago
The Russell Brand Rorschach Test Kathleen Stock
-
Substacks1 year ago
A real fact-check of Trump’s appearance on Meet the Press Judd Legum
-
Substacks1 year ago
Letter to the Children of Gaza – Read by Eunice Wong Chris Hedges